Profile
Electric Charging Station Calimesa CA US
Located at 1126 Calimesa Blvd, Calimesa, CA, this electric vehicle (EV) charging station provides convenient access to clean, renewable energy for drivers in the region. The facility offers multiple charging options, including Level 2 and DC fast chargers, catering to a range of EV models and user needs. Its strategic placement in Calimesa ensures accessibility for residents and travelers, supporting the growing demand for sustainable transportation in the area.
With 61 EV charging stations within a 10-mile radius of the ZIP code 92320, this location is part of a robust regional network that enhances convenience and reduces wait times for EV owners. The high density of charging infrastructure in the area reflects Calimesa’s commitment to supporting electric mobility, making it an ideal stop for long-distance travelers and a reliable resource for local commuters. Whether for quick top-ups or extended charging sessions, this station plays a vital role in promoting eco-friendly travel in Southern California.
Location Reviews
The Electric Charging Station at 1126 Calimesa Blvd, Calimesa, CA, has an overall rating of 4.1 based on 11 reviews, reflecting a generally positive but mixed user experience. Positives include reports that the station “almost always works” (Stephen Lombardo) and occasional mentions of successful, wait-free charging once directions are resolved (Debra J Fletcher). However, some users have noted issues, such as malfunctioning equipment: one reviewer (WE Music) reported a non-functional card reader and a blacked-out screen on another charger, describing the station as “neglected.” These technical problems highlight reliability concerns despite the high rating. The limited number of detailed reviews and the absence of additional comments from other users suggest a need for more comprehensive feedback to fully assess the station’s performance.
The station’s location and availability of nearby charging options (e.g., The Marketplace at Calimesa, Burger King) are mentioned in broader context, but specific details about the station’s maintenance, accessibility, or service quality remain sparse. While the overall sentiment leans slightly positive, the inconsistency in user experiences—ranging from dependable operation to equipment failures—underscores the importance of addressing technical issues to improve reliability. No other reviews provide further insights beyond the two detailed accounts, leaving gaps in understanding the station’s typical performance and user satisfaction.